Part Of QA Software Testing Inside the Software Life Cycle

Just like any other business investment, quality assurance is supposed for bringing value. The primary intent behind QA software testing is to make the software process better while making sure the end-product fits customer’s needs and they don’t have any problem. Exactly what it means is it prevents schedule creeps and budgeting problems; ensuring efficient discovery and eliminating defects ahead of the product reaches the end users. To put it briefly you can say that it can make the application process better and thus making the final product better too. It ensures the creation of the application process doesn’t have a hindrances, to ensure afterwards it doesn’t be a real problem when the product reaches inside the hand of ultimate users.


To become effective, quicktest pro training is going through every stage inside the software life-cycle. For each event inside the software life-cycle, there must be one or more QA support for centering on ensuring the standard of the procedure. Below are a few activities worth mentioning:

Project plan review – Before you start investing time, money and resources in the project, it is important to check perhaps the plan has covered everything, as small thing matter a lot and might result in a lot of problem afterwards. Everything has to be planned and executed in order to work efficiently. It is feasible with regards to timeline and resources, and even simple, if it’s complete.

Requirement review – After the requirements are written but before more resources are engaged in translating them into design and code. It’s very possible review them for correctness, completeness, testing etc. and fasten the matter if you have any still in some recoverable format. When the concern is not identified beforehand rather than addressed properly they can be a huge problem afterwards, which is hard to undo. Requirement review is essential, as everything that is required is discussed; if you don’t have something the procedure is certain to get hampered.

Pre-quality status evaluation – once you’ve executed your test, defects put together, now you have to make a decision what direction to go next; release a or otherwise not release a. An analysis of application’s quality level in terms of the impact with the defects discovered may help create a rational decision determined by clear data obtained through quality assurance.
Having quality assurance activities for many stages with the software life-cycle could help you save a lot of cash and time. Getting a condition in requirements cost ten or maybe more times cheaper to fixing exactly the same issue when present in testing. It is best to fix an issue in paper rather than to solve it physically.
For more information about quicktest pro training view this useful net page: check here

Leave a Reply