As any other business investment, quality assurance is supposed for bringing value. The main reason for QA software tests are to make the software process more effective while making sure that the end-product fits customer’s needs and they don’t have any problem. What it really means is it prevents schedule creeps and budgeting problems; ensuring efficient discovery and removal of defects prior to the product reaches the end users. In a nutshell you’ll be able to claim that it can make the program process better and therefore making a final product better too. It ensures the making of the program process doesn’t have a hindrances, in order that down the road it does not turn into a real problem in the event the product reaches in the hand of ultimate users.
To be effective, UFT Training is going through every stage in the software life cycle. For each event in the software life cycle, there needs to be one or more QA support for focusing on ensuring the grade of the process. Here are a few activities worth mentioning:
Project plan review – Prior to starting investing time, money and resources to the project, it is important to check perhaps the plan has covered everything, as small thing matter a great deal and may create a lots of problem down the road. All items have being planned and executed to be able to work efficiently. It’s feasible in terms of timeline and resources, as well as simple, whether it is complete.
Requirement review – When the requirements are written but before more resources are engaged in translating them into design and code. It is very feasible to review them for correctness, completeness, testing etc. and fix the situation if you have any still in some recoverable format. In the event the issue is not identified beforehand instead of handled properly they could be a huge problem down the road, which is hard to undo. Requirement review is very important, as exactly what is necessary is discussed; if you do not have something the process will get hampered.
Pre-quality status evaluation – when you have executed your test, defects were found, now you have to choose what to do next; to release or otherwise not to release. An analysis of application’s quality the impact from the defects discovered will help create a rational decision based on clear data obtained through quality assurance.
Having quality assurance activities for those stages from the software life cycle could help you save a lot of money and time. Getting a overuse injury in requirements may cost ten or maybe more times cheaper to fixing precisely the same issue when present in testing. It is best to resolve an issue in paper than to solve it physically.
For details about UFT Training have a look at this web site: check it out